Electrode Location Does Not Predict Contralateral Limb
Motor Function Improvement in Subthalamic Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
Shearwood McClelland III A.B.1, Blair Ford
M.D., F.R.C.P.C.2, Patrick B. Senatus M.D., Ph.D.1,
Steven J. Frucht M.D.2, Linda M. Winfield R.N., M.P.H.2,
Yunling E. Du Ph.D.3, Seth L. Pullman M.D., F.R.C.P.C.2,
Qiping Yu Ph.D.2, Guy M. McKhann II M.D.1, Robert R.
Goodman M.D., Ph.D.1
Departments of 1Neurological Surgery and 2Neurology,
Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
3Center
for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of
Public Health, New York, New York
Introduction:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic
nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractory
Parkinson's disease (PD). The
degree to which DBS electrode tip anatomic location determines the improvement
of contralateral limb movement function has not been defined. This
retrospective study was performed to address this issue.
Methods:
42 DBS electrode tips in 21 bilaterally implanted
patients were localized on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The postoperative and preoperative
planning MRIs were merged with the Stealth stereotactic planning workstation to
determine the DBS tip coordinates.
Stimulation settings were postoperatively optimized for maximal clinical
effect. Patients were videotaped
one year postoperatively and assessed by a movement disorder neurologist
blinded to electrode tip locations.
The nine limb-related components of the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS)
Part III [Rest tremor (hand, foot), Action tremor, Rigidity (upper, lower
extremity), Finger tapping, Hand gripping, Hand pronation/supination, Leg
agility] were tabulated to obtain a limb score [(off-stimulation,
off-medications) minus (on-stimulation, off-medications)]. The electrode tip locations associated
with the 15 least and 15 greatest limb response scores were compared to postoperative
limb function.
Results:
Statistical analysis (two-tailed t-test) revealed no
significant difference in electrode tip location between the two groups with
regard to three-dimensional distance (P=.759), lateral-medial (X) axis distance
(P=.983), anterior-posterior (Y) axis distance (P=.949) or superior-inferior
(Z) axis distance (P=.894) from the intended anatomical target. The range of difference in tip location
(X-axis = 2.5 mm lateral to 5.1 mm medial; Y-axis = 4.1 mm posterior to 2 mm
anterior) and limb scores (-2.5 to +22.5) was extensive.
Conclusions:
Within
the range of electrode tip locations (relative to the intended target) in this
study, the postoperative MRI-determined electrode position does not predict the
improvement of contralateral limb motor parkinsonism. Other factors may have a greater bearing on the limb
responsiveness of these patients.